Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| what-is-woman [2024/12/25 23:47] – [Deconstructing TERF Fallacies] pitt | what-is-woman [2025/06/04 21:22] (current) – [The Answer and/or Response] pitt | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| The most consistent and humane definition is: A woman is anyone who sincerely identifies as a woman. | The most consistent and humane definition is: A woman is anyone who sincerely identifies as a woman. | ||
| - | This centers the fact that gender identity determines who is a woman, not anatomy, chromosomes, | + | This centers the fact that gender identity determines who is a woman, not anatomy, chromosomes, |
| + | |||
| + | As JoJoFromJerz powerfully asserts, //"A woman is whatever the hell she wants to be. We get to decide."// | ||
| Biological essentialism fails to capture the diversity of both cis and trans women: | Biological essentialism fails to capture the diversity of both cis and trans women: | ||
| Line 63: | Line 65: | ||
| Some will object to our definition, calling it circular. But this definition, while seemingly round-about, | Some will object to our definition, calling it circular. But this definition, while seemingly round-about, | ||
| - | Self-identification respects individuals' | + | - Self-identification respects individuals' |
| - | + | | |
| - | Many important concepts resist simple, non-circular definitions. We'd be hard-pressed to define consciousness, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Attempts at non-circular definitions based on biology or stereotypical gender roles quickly break down. They inevitably exclude many women, both trans and cis, who don't fit narrow criteria. Such a definition is virtually impossible. Insisting on non-circularity leads to worse definitions, | + | |
| - | We need a definition of " | + | We need a definition of " |
| So while it may have a circular element in its phrasing, it does not seem to fully meet the criteria of a circular argument fallacy. The criterion is the important bit, and as such, the definition is not simply assuming the truth of the conclusion as a premise. If you dive into definitions a bit more deeply, you will find most all definitions are circular in some way. | So while it may have a circular element in its phrasing, it does not seem to fully meet the criteria of a circular argument fallacy. The criterion is the important bit, and as such, the definition is not simply assuming the truth of the conclusion as a premise. If you dive into definitions a bit more deeply, you will find most all definitions are circular in some way. | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| Constantly interrogating trans women' | Constantly interrogating trans women' | ||
| - | It marks them as " | + | * It marks them as " |
| - | It emboldens harassment, discrimination, | + | * It emboldens harassment, discrimination, |
| - | It props up harmful policies like bathroom bills and bans on trans healthcare | + | * It props up harmful policies like bathroom bills and bans on trans healthcare |
| Fixating on defining womanhood in relation to a tiny minority is a cruel distraction from the sexism all women face, especially from cis men. As JoJoFromJerz notes: | Fixating on defining womanhood in relation to a tiny minority is a cruel distraction from the sexism all women face, especially from cis men. As JoJoFromJerz notes: | ||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
| This is why the best answer to this question/ | This is why the best answer to this question/ | ||
| - | If you must engage with this question/ | + | If you must engage with this question/ |
| ===== A Better Way Forward ===== | ===== A Better Way Forward ===== | ||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
| [(NB7> | [(NB7> | ||
| - | Yes, I am not happy to cut such a stark dichotomy here but I felt it appropriate. I feel very strongly about human rights issues, and trans rights are human rights. “The only thing needed for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing” comes readily to mind.)] | + | Yes, I am not happy to cut such a stark dichotomy here but I felt it appropriate. I feel very strongly about human rights issues, and trans rights are human rights. |