Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
common-sources-misinfo [2025/12/30 02:48] – [How Reduxx Frames Itself] valahcommon-sources-misinfo [2025/12/30 02:48] (current) – [Example: The Swedish Study Misuse] valah
Line 195: Line 195:
 The SPLC's network analysis reveals that media outlets like **The City Journal, Quillette, UnHerd, and Reduxx** operate as a coordinated ecosystem: [(pb21)] The SPLC's network analysis reveals that media outlets like **The City Journal, Quillette, UnHerd, and Reduxx** operate as a coordinated ecosystem: [(pb21)]
  
-- 1. **Research & Practice groups** (SEGM, CAN-SG, ICGDR) produce pseudoscientific reports+1. **Research & Practice groups** (SEGM, CAN-SG, ICGDR) produce pseudoscientific reports
  
-- 2. **Think tanks** (Manhattan Institute, Heritage Foundation, AEI) provide institutional legitimacy+2. **Think tanks** (Manhattan Institute, Heritage Foundation, AEI) provide institutional legitimacy
  
-- 3. **Narrative Manipulation outlets** (The City Journal, Quillette, UnHerd, Reduxx) repackage claims for mass consumption+3. **Narrative Manipulation outlets** (The City Journal, Quillette, UnHerd, Reduxx) repackage claims for mass consumption
  
-- 4. **Legal Advocacy groups** (Alliance Defending Freedom, Heritage Foundation) translate narratives into litigation and legislation+4. **Legal Advocacy groups** (Alliance Defending Freedom, Heritage Foundation) translate narratives into litigation and legislation
  
 These outlets **do not operate independently**—they amplify each other's content, cross-promote speakers, and coordinate messaging timelines. A single claim originating in a SEGM white paper can appear across The City Journal, Quillette, UnHerd, and Reduxx within days, creating the false impression of widespread, independent concern rather than coordinated messaging. These outlets **do not operate independently**—they amplify each other's content, cross-promote speakers, and coordinate messaging timelines. A single claim originating in a SEGM white paper can appear across The City Journal, Quillette, UnHerd, and Reduxx within days, creating the false impression of widespread, independent concern rather than coordinated messaging.
Line 217: Line 217:
 However, the study's actual findings show: However, the study's actual findings show:
  
-- Transition improves mental health outcomes +  * Transition improves mental health outcomes 
- +  * The study did not measure the effects of transition itself 
-- The study did not measure the effects of transition itself +  * Crime rate comparisons were taken out of methodological context
- +
-- Crime rate comparisons were taken out of methodological context+
  
 This single misquoted paper spreads through the coordinated network (SEGM→The City Journal/Quillette→UnHerd/Reduxx→audience), appears in policy briefs, and becomes cited as "evidence." This single misquoted paper spreads through the coordinated network (SEGM→The City Journal/Quillette→UnHerd/Reduxx→audience), appears in policy briefs, and becomes cited as "evidence."

Trace: • index • debunking-puberty-blockers • common-sources-misinfo

Print/export
QR Code
QR Code common-sources-misinfo (generated for current page)